legacy at the speed of sound
yeah. i know like most things in life i've got it twisted up in a way which defeats the purpose. and i know the things i have to say aren't the kind of things you post in a place like this, but i don't mind so much. i'm just sorting things out. and when i go through my things, i look at every scrap of paper, every receipt. and i save nearly everything. most people would say i make a mess when i clean. if you know me beyond whatever can be imagined using only the entries in a blog - you know that this is me. i often fall into fits of metaphor and verbal catastrophe. i often skip through mental ghettos making little sense. but i do it passionately. how much more so when i'm speaking to myself! i guess i just like stitching quilts of seemingly random thoughts. little squares of fabric cut from the same bolt stitched back into the whole. i also like how words sound together. sometimes many words together. sometimes just one or two. it's like food. sometimes a statement requires the complex architecture of curry. other thoughts are as simple as celery. both have a time and place. this? my blog? yeah - it's more like indian food. probably not even good indian food. but my mind is definitely not celery these days.anyway, how words sound together is sometimes - certainly sometimes if not most times - more important to me than the meaning forced upon them...though a pairing violates the prescription of every grammar, a novel lexical marriage is somehow procreative. "be fruitful and multiply," the command went. i've got the fruit part down. and this? this is my multiplication.
new ways of seeing, new visions - realities are born from forbidden semantic trysts. a view can be just as interesting, maybe even more so, when seen through dirty windows framed in chipping paint. it's inductive. it takes work, effort to see. you have to want to see. transparency can actually blind you from what you might otherwise see if you were actually trying. passivity can whitewash the world's tiger-maple. so with words, sometimes it's critical to make your point in a crowded scene, one obscurred by the soot and dust of so many years of neglect. and sometimes the dictionary is of little use. the meaning isn't often superficial. consider this practise.
so. this evening is a friday evening and i'm spending it with Dalwhinnie Scotch and Jeff Buckley - two good friends. the only two good friends who aren't busy with something else tonite.
and i'm realising that sometime over fifteen years ago in scotland, my scotch was made. strange. i've never been to scotland, but here i am drinking it. a great-great-great something to me - my mother's mother's father's father's father came from over there. the sometime Earl of Lennox just outside Glasgow. maybe he was buried in a wooden box. maybe became the soil, the grass, the field. maybe he's in my scotch now. what an odd, ironic circle that would be.
and then there's the late mister buckley. when i listen to him sing or look at a picture of him, i know what the word beautiful means and when to use it - again, the dictionary was of little use there. he's dead. dead at 30. i'm almost 30. his beauty is like a pressed flower found in an old family bible. it's a new and different beauty to the one who finds it than was appreciated by the one who placed it there. it's never the same when the life leaves. and if the one who placed it there goes back amid the pages to see the treasured beauty, it's not there. the matter which once formed the flower is there and still holds its general shape and rumors of the original color, but the original beauty is gone. the beholder's eye either sees through the pressed bloom as a sacramental reference to a memory and resurrects the original beauty in the mind or it closes the book in disappointment. i didn't put the blossom in between the pages. i bought the book and found what someone else thought was beautiful. and it is, still. but i wonder what it was that first rested on the page before the book was closed. i can only imagine.
so i'm listening to a dead man's voice. that's a relatively new thing. we can't listen to abraham lincoln recite the gettysburg address. we can't listen to jesus preach the sermon on the mount. we just open the pages of a book we inherited and view dried flowers in bewilderment, imagining the unplucked beauty. i wonder, will someone listen to my voice after i'm dead? it's hard to wrap my mind around. you can be gone from here - dust from dust - and echos of you persist - bouncing off canyons you yourself never saw - echos above the age of consent. you have no mouth to keep shut and the waveforms of your last cellphone conversation pogostick about the universe. you - disembodied - absent - like someone that got off a train. when it's your time, it's your time, they say. but what is it like to turn around, to look back as the train plows onward...with your voice...your image...your ideas and words? the letter you wrote sitting in a jail cell in birmingham? it's a mitotic parting of the self with itself...the whole into halves...or maybe just a half and a half not. whether you believe in life after death is inconsequential. part of you lives on with or without your consent.
what would i leave? what would go on when i step off?
maybe this.
and what would i take with me? what can we take with us?
Jeff sings a song called "Satisfied Mind"
How many times have you heard someone say,
"If I had money, I would do things my way."
But little they know, that it's so hard to find
one rich man in ten, with a satisfied mind.
Money can't buy back all your youth when you're old,
a friend when you're lonely, or peace to your soul.
The wealthiest person, is a pauper at times
compared to the man with a satisfied mind.
When my life is over and my time has run out,
my friends and my loved ones, I will leave there's no doubt.
But one thing's for certain, when it comes my time,
I'll leave this old world with a satisfied mind.
But one thing's for certain, when it comes my time,
I'll leave this old world with a satisfied mind mind mind, mind mind,
satisfied mind.
